It may not be the best or the greatest. It is an American website so the batches are all 5 US gallon opposed to the 6 IMP gallon batches typically made here in Canada.
Hope this is useful for some of the newer brewers!





I couldn't agree more John! The US is a big-ole-stick in the mud when it comes to switching to metric.John G wrote:US vs Imperial gallons.... I think the US needs to switch to metric like practically everyone else in the world.

Yay, Kyle! We're taking over this forum one brewer at a time.TJ Brew wrote:I couldn't agree more John! The US is a big-ole-stick in the mud when it comes to switching to metric.John G wrote:US vs Imperial gallons.... I think the US needs to switch to metric like practically everyone else in the world.

derek wrote:Yay, Kyle! We're taking over this forum one brewer at a time.TJ Brew wrote:I couldn't agree more John! The US is a big-ole-stick in the mud when it comes to switching to metric.John G wrote:US vs Imperial gallons.... I think the US needs to switch to metric like practically everyone else in the world.
All my brews are in 40L batches. Of course, if I get everything right and hit 40L finished brew, it's a miracle...

Yes. My boil size is 47 liters and I don't generally have a boil-over problem without anti-foaming agents. It's close - I have to add hops slowly.know1 wrote:Do you, or anyone else do regular "double" batch boils in a sankey keg? I'm considering a 40-45L finished batch boil and I'm thinking anti-foam is imperative for this volume. What's the deal on controlling boil overs? And any time estimate to get a keggle with that amount up to rolling boil on a propane burner? (which reminds me I may have to look into structural reinforcing the stand for that weight)derek wrote:All my brews are in 40L batches. Of course, if I get everything right and hit 40L finished brew, it's a miracle...



I find that adding some of your hot wort to the hops just prior to the addition helps with the violent reaction when adding them. I just add enough wort to turn them to much then add them In.John G wrote:A spray bottle with water works well to control boil overs. Spray the surface when it looks like it's getting ready to go over and the foam dissipates. A good way to keep control of the boil until the break occurs and boil over risk goes away. Like Derek said, you have to watch out for potential boil overs as a result of any additions during the boil.

I wouldn't use "metric gallons"mr x wrote:I don't understand what the purpose in using metric gallons is. Kegs are US gal. And i like defoamer for my 10 gallon batches, makes life easy the way I brew.



I use L wherever I can, but I appreciate it when people clarify US or imperial so I can convert to L. When I started I had a few batches with OG's way too high because someone didn't list it as imperial. Now I use software, but it is still nice to be clear. If you use L you don't have to worry about it, but most homebrewers are in the US so your not likely going to get them off their system any time soon.TJ Brew wrote:So I put the note about US Gallons in there in the event someone was trying to convert it to Litres.It is possible that people forget, or assume that everyone uses metric or Imperial (except for the US who use their own US Gallons). I know I have done it and not realized it straight away.

Like I said - I had no idea. I've seen them listed as both 18 and 20L and 4 and 5 gallons. So I calculated, which is way safer than taking the manufacturer's word that they're 5 US gallons, anyway.mr x wrote:IIRC, The dip tubes on corneys are calculated for 5 US gallon volume. That makes them 5 gallon kegs to me.


I'm okay with the U.S. sticking with Imperial/Colonial/Republican as long as they don't export knowledge to rest of the world in that format.derek wrote:Yay, Kyle! We're taking over this forum one brewer at a time.TJ Brew wrote:I couldn't agree more John! The US is a big-ole-stick in the mud when it comes to switching to metric.John G wrote:US vs Imperial gallons.... I think the US needs to switch to metric like practically everyone else in the world.

Yes, the beauty of metric is that a litre is a litre and a metre is a metre whenever you go (oh yeah, except in the U.S. where a litre is a liter and a metre is a meter; if Americans don't use metric why do they need their own spellings for the units?).mgc wrote:I use L wherever I can, but I appreciate it when people clarify US or imperial so I can convert to L. When I started I had a few batches with OG's way too high because someone didn't list it as imperial. Now I use software, but it is still nice to be clear. If you use L you don't have to worry about it, but most homebrewers are in the US so your not likely going to get them off their system any time soon.


Yeah that's 5gal (imperial) as opposed to 5 US gallons (20L).jameswwright wrote:When I was brewing extract batches in Vancouver I followed recipes from the local shop and they were all for 23 liter batches. Not sure how standard that is but the extra 4 liters or so over a U.S batch seemed good to me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests